The New Jersey Landlord/Tenant Laws are in place to protect both parties from misconduct. For instance, New Jersey Eviction Laws 2:18-53 & 61.1 are utilized to put a stop to criminal activity such as drug dealing and unlawful possession, use, and manufacture of weapons as well as other misconducts or threats to the safety of others. If the landlord knows these crimes are taking place on his or her property, the landlord is required to give the tenant eviction notice within 30 days. Additional grounds for eviction include tardy rent payment, breaking any part of a lease agreement including damage to the property, and continued complaints of disturbance or nuisance. Continue reading
Even on a Voided Insurance Policy Insurance Company Still Liable to Third Party for Mandatory Minimums (Part 2)
In Part 1 of this article, we read about civil litigation that followed an accident in which an injured victim of a personal injury case was initially denied compensation because the driver was not on the car owner’s insurance policy and the policy was therefore, voided. The insurance company’s declaratory action regarding the victim’s compensation was denied. Keep reading to find out what happened in the appeal. Continue reading
Even on a Voided Insurance Policy Insurance Company Still Liable to Third Party for Mandatory Minimums (Part 1)
All automobile owners in New Jersey must carry insurance. Under New Jersey Statute 39:6A-3 the insurance must include a minimum of $15,000.00 per person, $30,000.00 per accident and $5,000.00 for property damage. But what happens if an automobile owner fraudulently applies for and receives insurance? If that car owner has an accident, is the insurance company still liable to cover the mandatory minimums? According its recent decision in Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. Perez, A-3100-11T1 (App. Div. Sept. 13, 2013) The Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division finds that the insurance company is liable to cover the mandatory minimums. Continue reading
New Jersey Court Finds Texter Liable if Texting a Driver
The New Jersey Judiciary has been busy lately with cases about cellphones. First there was the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruling in State v. Earls, No. A-53-11 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 2013), which held that an individual has a right to privacy regarding cell-phone location information. More recently, in Kuber v. Best, No. A-1128-12T4 (N.J. Super App. Div. 2013) (Not Approved for Publication without the Approval of the Appellate Division), the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division decided whether “as a matter of civil common law whether one who is texting from a location remote from the driver of a motor vehicle can be liable to persons injured because the driver was distracted by the text.” (Id. 4). In other words, can a person be liable for texting a driver and then the driver has a traffic accident.
Guidance on Resource Extraction Payments Disclosure From the SEC
In recent years, the Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC) has begun to take a more proactive approach in ensuring transparency among major financial entities. This proactive approach was established in The Dodd-Frank Act. One of these reforms has been to create legislation that requires the institution to provide disclosures about resource extraction payments. This legislation is designed to prevent fraud in the world of alternative investments.
If you are considering applying for a contract with a certain governmental entity, then you may wish to meet with a Union New Jersey Business Lawyer. A New Jersey Business Lawyer can help you to understand the terms of the agreement. Our office also serves Elizabeth and other nearby North Jersey towns and cities.
Any entity that engages in the production of commercial oil or other natural resources will be required to abide by the new legislation. The SEC will now require that these entities make reports on a cash-basis. These entities will need to completely redo the way in which they do their accounting.
Those who wish to ensure that they also abide by this disclosure method may wish to meet with a Business Lawyer in Union or Newark New Jersey. A Business Law attorney can help you to see whether your accounting methods suffice for the new SEC legislation. A Newark Business Law attorney can also work to explain the specific ramifications of this legislation for your commercial oil enterprise. It will be important that you understand the law and abide by it in the future, otherwise you may face a hefty fine from the SEC. In some cases, the SEC may even find that a lack of disclosures constitutes grounds for a charge of fraud. You do not want this to happen to your commercial resource enterprise.
An attorney from The Jayson Law Group LLC can help you to figure out ways to make disclosures and continue to have a competitive advantage. One of the major concerns of this legislation is that oil produces will not be at a competitive disadvantage for sharing certain information. If you prepare ahead of time, this does not have to be you. Just because you make disclosures to the SEC does not mean that you have to lose out on clients to all of your competitors.
What Happens When You Find a Copy of the Decedent’s Will and it is Not Signed?
What happens when an estate attorney drafts a Will but never signs it? Should the will be enforceable? Should the courts allow the Will to be probated? Or, should the will be deemed invalid and barring the finding of another Will drafted by that attorney, should the estate be deemed intestate and be distributed according to the New Jersey rules of intestacy? These were the issues the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division decided in In re Ehrlich, 427 N.J. Super 64 (App. Div. 2012), certif. denied 213 N.J. 46 (2013), appeal dismissed, __ N.J. __ (2013). Continue reading
Trust May Not Be the Best Strategy When Buying a Business or Selling a Business
When the time comes to buying a business or selling a business, it may be one of the most important legal dealings you’ll ever have occasion to undertake. While it seems straightforward enough to transfer rights of ownership from one person or group to another, it really isn’t, and there are a seemingly endless number of ways in which both sides need to have their interests protected. Too often, the loopholes that exist in the buying and selling of businesses are overlooked by one or both parties, and can later be exploited and become a point of contention. Hiring a business lawyer serving Newark is one of the smartest ways to eliminate any such problems, and give both parties a mutual sense of security in the transaction. When it comes to Business Law The Jayson Law Group LLC has a number of skilled professionals waiting to handle all types of cases, and you can rest assured that you’ll have a New Jersey Business Lawyer on your side who truly believes in protecting your best interests. Continue reading
New Jersey Legislature Contemplating Bill Concerning Payment of Independent Contractors
Proposed Bill A3310, introduced in the New Jersey State Assembly by Assemblyman Timothy J. Eustace and Assemblywoman Connie Wagner, attempts to supplement chapter 11 of Title 34 of the Revised Statutes by regulating the payments by businesses to Independent Contractors passed in the New Jersey State Assembly on June 24, 2013. An identical bill, S2496 introduced by State Senator Fred H. Madden Jr., is being considered in the New Jersey State Senate. The bill is applicable to any independent contractor hired or retained by a business for an amount equal or greater than $600.00 and if the Assembly bill is enacted would take effect immediately.
If the bill passed by the New Jersey State Assembly passes the New Jersey State Senate and is enacted into law, it would mean that an independent contractor hired by a business shall be paid in accordance with the agreed upon work terms between the two parties. The bill also stipulates that if there is no agreement between the two parties as to when payment should be rendered then the independent contractor is to be paid “not later than the last day of the month following the month in which the compensation is earned.” (Assembly, No. 3310, 30-31 (2013))
If there is an agreement, it must be signed by the independent contractor and the business employing the independent contractor must keep the agreement on file for not less than six (6) years, which is the amount of time an independent contractor would have to file a complaint with the Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development (“Commissioner”). Furthermore, the business must be able to produce the signed agreement to the Commissioner upon request. The agreement needs to include a description of how the independent contractor’s payment is earned and calculated. If the Commissioner requests to see an agreement and the business cannot produce the agreement, there is a presumption that the terms the independent contractor claims exists are the agreed terms.
The bill also empowers the Commissioner to bring any legal action necessary for the independent contractor to collect monies owed and requires that the business pay for both the court costs and reasonable attorney fees the court deems are owed. The Commissioner may also request liquidated damages unless the business can prove that it had a good faith basis for the payment the business made to the independent contractor. Liquidated damages would be capped at 100% of the total compensation found to be due and owing to the independent contractor.
The attorneys at The Jayson Law Group LLC can work with businesses to draft contract agreements with their independent contractors to comply with this proposed law. Our firm serves Irvington, New Jersey and many of the towns and cities throughout Essex and Union Counties.
Arbitration Clauses with Class Action Waiver in Corporate Charters?
In a recent case, American Express Co., Et. Al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, ___ U.S. ___ (2013), the Supreme Court continued to uphold the validity of arbitration clauses in class action waiver agreements for corporations. Decided June 20, 2013, this opinion, written by Justice Scalia for the majority, is nothing new, and the Supreme Court is simply reinforcing an existing law. The implications of this law on the average merchant can be quite interesting to explore. Continue reading
CFPB Bulletin 2013-07 Prohibition of Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices in the Collection of Consumer Debts—Part II
Last time we outlined the Unfair acts or practice definition according to the Dodd-Frank Act. In the conclusion to this article we will add the final two practices under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Deceptive Act or Practice
The Bulletin also describes what conduct would be a deceptive act or practice by a business according to Dodd-Frank. The determining factors are:
1. “The act or practice misleads or is likely to mislead the consumer;
2. The consumer’s interpretation is reasonable under the circumstances; and
3. The misleading act or practice is material.” [footnote omitted].
Just like with the unfair act or practice, the CFBP will look at the totality of the circumstances to determine if the collector mislead the consumer. CFPB Bulletin 2013-07 did note that representations and omission can constitute misleading a consumer.
CFPB Bulletin 2013-07 stated that “[t]o determine if the consumer’s interpretation of the information was reasonable under the circumstances when representations target a specific audience, such as older Americans or financially distressed consumers, the communication may be considered from the perspective of a reasonable member of the target audience.” [footnote omitted]. A further caveat to this is that if a significant minority of a group is deceived by the act or practice, then the act or practice is misleading. If a business makes a representation that could have two meanings and one of the meanings if false, it will be deemed a violation of the Dodd-Frank Act as a deceptive act or practice.
Abusive Acts or Practices
CFPB Bulletin 2013-07 also outlined what would constitute an abusive act or practice by a business under the Dodd-Frank Act. The factors to determine if the conduct is abusive are:
1) Materially interferes with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service; or
2)Takes reasonable advantage of –
a) a consumer’s lack of understanding of the material risks, costs, or conditions of the product or service;
b) a consumer’s inability to protect his or her interests in selecting or using a consumer financial product or service; or
c) a consumer’s reasonable reliance on a covered person to act in his or her interests.” [footnote omitted].
CFPB Bulletin 2013-07 states that each of these abusive acts are judged by a separate legal standard.
Do you have Questions regarding how CFPB 2013-07 affects you? Contact your Union New Jersey Business Attorney, The Jayson Law Group LLC.